Rawls

Is it safe to say Rawls is screwing up in practice? All the talk from Hoke that they would change up backs and then Rawls never saw the field. Ball security issues maybe? They only seem to play him when the game is not on the line. Anyone heard anything?

Who? Just kidding. I thought we would see him against this D because he is a bigger guy, but I don't think he played one down.

He didn't and aside from the one 38 yard run Fitz had he was largely ineffective (finished with 52 yards).

Yeah, I didn't notice that at the game, but you're right: there was no Rawls.

Did we see any other RB in there on Saturday, save for Vincent Smith and his 1st down run (which was HUGE) on the first play of our last offensive series?

Willie- My guess has been the same as yours-that there might be ball security issues and/or blocking issues in practice.

'shoes

It's so strange. The kid makes an appearance bowls over some tacklers and scores a TD or two and then disappears again. The mystery that is Thomas Rawls.

I am sure getting tired of this east-west shit from Fitz...I dont know what he is trying to do or trying to prove but it sure in heck is not working

But 13, it's the plays that are called.

When was the last time Fitz lined up in the I and blasted between the tackles?

There have been many times that I can remember where he was to blast but ended up bouncing outside...by hey your idea of a blast and my idea could be completely different. I just think something needs to be done and soon.