Can't really say I argue with this ranking.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1556377-the-10-most-dominant-college-football-recruiting-schools-right-now?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=recruiting#/articles/1556377-the-10-most-dominant-college-football-recruiting-schools-right-now/page/6

Sounds about right.

LSU, Alabama and OSU are definitely three schools that have to be in front of us.

I didn't look at all the teams and where they fall, but I'd say six is about right.

First of all, what do they mean by "dominant right now". I'd have to assume they mean at least a span of the last two years. That would imply sustained recruiting achievement. IMO dominant can't just mean having one decent year. In that case, Texas A&M shouldn't be that high. I'd put UM, ND and O$U all above them.

A&M had a decent year in 2013 (UM, ND and O$U all finished better) but hadn't had a top 10 ranked class since 2003. They did have a few top 20 classes in the past decade but hardly enough to call them dominant.

I think the article is putting to much into the Johnny Football hype and A&M's move to the SEC.

By the way here are the average Scout final rankings for the last two classes for each of the team on that list...

#10 LSU - 7.5

#9 Florida State - 13.5

#8 Texas - 12

#7 Ole Miss - 34

#6 Michigan - 3

#5 Notre Dame - 10

#4 Ohio $tate - 2

#3 Texas A&M - 13.5

#2 Florida - 6

#1 Alabama - 2.5

Ole Miss is only here because of the two big dogs they captured on signing day. I wouldnt list them here, at least not yet.