| ND predictions | |
|
+8Admin joe michmike GOBLUEJOE66 EJinGA fishgoblue22 ThatGuy sandyeggo_blue 12 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
sandyeggo_blue
Posts : 6174 Join date : 2012-01-23 Age : 45 Location : San Diego, CA
| Subject: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:57 am | |
| - Tommy Rees will not complete a pass longer than 30 yards. Maybe there will be one longer than 30 if you take into consideration the yards after catch but UM won't give up a long ball catch.
- UM will run for 100 in the first half. I know Drake is out, and he was going to be my guy, but if Temple can run for 4.3 yds per carry then UM is going to easily put up 100 in the first half.
- Time of Possession ends up somewhere around UM 35 ND 25.
- UM has three rushing TDs, one by DG and two by the stable of backs.
- Gallon has at least 75 receiving yards. In fact I wouldn't be surprised to see DG throw for 300. NDs secondary looked terrible in the first game.
- The UM D gets at least two sacks and five knockdowns.
- UM easily covers the spread and wins 38 - 21.
_________________ Sometimes people standing on third base think they hit a triple, but they didn't - Jim Harbaugh
| |
|
| |
ThatGuy
Posts : 8811 Join date : 2012-02-03 Age : 49 Location : Within 10 minutes of The Big House.
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:14 am | |
| 34-27 Blue. _________________ 'eggo denoted me a First ballot Hall of Famer! - sandyeggo_blue wrote:
- that's some first ballot hall of fame stalking on your part. How in the world did you find that guy. I guess the better question is why?
| |
|
| |
fishgoblue22
Posts : 5419 Join date : 2012-01-24 Age : 55 Location : Fishers, IN
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 6:24 am | |
| I don't see it as a large margin of victory. It rarely is in this game. I'm going with UM 27 ND 21. Gibbons two FGs are the difference. | |
|
| |
EJinGA
Posts : 949 Join date : 2012-08-24
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:06 am | |
| | |
|
| |
GOBLUEJOE66
Posts : 1673 Join date : 2012-01-29 Age : 78 Location : Alabama
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:20 am | |
| 17 - 13 UM. Go Blue!! _________________ Who's got it better than us? Nooooooooobody!!!
| |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:30 am | |
| |
|
| |
michmike
Posts : 1801 Join date : 2012-02-03 Location : Buffalo NY
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:49 am | |
| - GOBLUEJOE66 wrote:
- 17 - 13 UM.
Go Blue!! I'm going (most closely) with yours, '66. I simply don't see either team scoring 27, 30, 38 points. I look for defenses to play a bigger role...our last three wins over ND notwithstanding. But I'll tack on another Gibbons FG and go with 20-13. | |
|
| |
joe
Posts : 4950 Join date : 2012-01-25 Age : 61 Location : God's Country
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:15 am | |
| 22-16 Michigan _________________ "What the HELL's going on out here?"
| |
|
| |
Admin Admin
Posts : 4445 Join date : 2012-01-21 Location : Chicago, IL
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:44 am | |
| Lot of money being put on Michigan.
I'll take 'em, 31-29. _________________ "I don't get sick. I don't observe major holidays. I'm a jackhammer." - Jim Harbaugh & Dwight Schrute
| |
|
| |
joe
Posts : 4950 Join date : 2012-01-25 Age : 61 Location : God's Country
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 9:50 am | |
| I also predict it comes down to the last minute. _________________ "What the HELL's going on out here?"
| |
|
| |
michmike
Posts : 1801 Join date : 2012-02-03 Location : Buffalo NY
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:09 am | |
| - joe wrote:
- 22-16 Michigan
So you predict a total of EIGHT field goals, Joe? Five by us, giving Gibbons' accuracy from 40 yards in, and Wile's strength, is not out of the question...but three by ND would move me to believe they'll all be very short...given that ND's special teams are anything but...and that fact in itself could prove a vital factor in our favor. | |
|
| |
joe
Posts : 4950 Join date : 2012-01-25 Age : 61 Location : God's Country
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:09 am | |
| Exactly mike.
I think it's gonna be a field goal fest. _________________ "What the HELL's going on out here?"
| |
|
| |
hailtoyourvictor
Posts : 2537 Join date : 2012-12-12
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:03 pm | |
| I don't think it's smart to predict a lot of girl goals for Michigan. With Gardner a QB, Michigan is one of the best red zone teams in the nation _________________ | |
|
| |
fishgoblue22
Posts : 5419 Join date : 2012-01-24 Age : 55 Location : Fishers, IN
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:19 pm | |
| - hailtoyourvictor wrote:
- I don't think it's smart to predict a lot of girl goals for Michigan. With Gardner a QB, Michigan is one of the best red zone teams in the nation
I had a lot of girl goals but got married young so that didn't work out. But the marriage did. LOL | |
|
| |
joe
Posts : 4950 Join date : 2012-01-25 Age : 61 Location : God's Country
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:33 pm | |
| lololol _________________ "What the HELL's going on out here?"
| |
|
| |
ThatGuy
Posts : 8811 Join date : 2012-02-03 Age : 49 Location : Within 10 minutes of The Big House.
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:42 pm | |
| - michmike wrote:
- joe wrote:
- 22-16 Michigan
So you predict a total of EIGHT field goals, Joe? Five by us, giving Gibbons' accuracy from 40 yards in, and Wile's strength, is not out of the question...but three by ND would move me to believe they'll all be very short...given that ND's special teams are anything but...and that fact in itself could prove a vital factor in our favor. That or maybe joe is predicting a missed extra point.... _________________ 'eggo denoted me a First ballot Hall of Famer! - sandyeggo_blue wrote:
- that's some first ballot hall of fame stalking on your part. How in the world did you find that guy. I guess the better question is why?
| |
|
| |
sandyeggo_blue
Posts : 6174 Join date : 2012-01-23 Age : 45 Location : San Diego, CA
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:05 pm | |
| - hailtoyourvictor wrote:
- I don't think it's smart to predict a lot of girl goals for Michigan. With Gardner a QB, Michigan is one of the best red zone teams in the nation
read something on ESPN today that said that in the last six games gardner has gotten UM into the red zone 22 times. UM has scored a TD on 19 of those possessions. Hail is exactly right, I think we score a lot of TDs in this game. That's why I give the high score. Plus I want to add that I think this is the year that the balance is clearly on one teams side. I think Michigan wins big. _________________ Sometimes people standing on third base think they hit a triple, but they didn't - Jim Harbaugh
| |
|
| |
rasputin
Posts : 184 Join date : 2012-02-02 Location : Mission Viejo, California
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:26 am | |
| 21-17 Michigan. _________________ “And I remember across those years Two banners that crowned the crest, When Yale was king of the conquered East, And Michigan ruled the West.”
| |
|
| |
fishgoblue22
Posts : 5419 Join date : 2012-01-24 Age : 55 Location : Fishers, IN
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Fri Sep 06, 2013 6:07 am | |
| - sandyeggo_blue wrote:
- hailtoyourvictor wrote:
- I don't think it's smart to predict a lot of girl goals for Michigan. With Gardner a QB, Michigan is one of the best red zone teams in the nation
read something on ESPN today that said that in the last six games gardner has gotten UM into the red zone 22 times. UM has scored a TD on 19 of those possessions. Wow, that is some efficiency. Gardner seems his best on 3rd down and in the red zone. | |
|
| |
ThatGuy
Posts : 8811 Join date : 2012-02-03 Age : 49 Location : Within 10 minutes of The Big House.
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Fri Sep 06, 2013 5:12 pm | |
| Valenti picked Michigan 34-17. That just doesn't seem like him.... _________________ 'eggo denoted me a First ballot Hall of Famer! - sandyeggo_blue wrote:
- that's some first ballot hall of fame stalking on your part. How in the world did you find that guy. I guess the better question is why?
| |
|
| |
MichiganFootball13
Posts : 687 Join date : 2012-01-27 Age : 35 Location : Grand Rapids
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Fri Sep 06, 2013 5:49 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
dwoody
Posts : 3634 Join date : 2012-03-12 Age : 71 Location : Michissippi - Don't drink the water!
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Fri Sep 06, 2013 6:02 pm | |
| M31 ND17 Our D has a score. | |
|
| |
sandyeggo_blue
Posts : 6174 Join date : 2012-01-23 Age : 45 Location : San Diego, CA
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Sun Sep 08, 2013 1:20 am | |
| - sandyeggo_blue wrote:
- - Tommy Rees will not complete a pass longer than 30 yards. Maybe there will be one longer than 30 if you take into consideration the yards after catch but UM won't give up a long ball catch. - Check
- UM will run for 100 in the first half. I know Drake is out, and he was going to be my guy, but if Temple can run for 4.3 yds per carry then UM is going to easily put up 100 in the first half. - They only ran for 96 in the first half
- Time of Possession ends up somewhere around UM 35 ND 25. - UM=34:04 ND=25:56
- UM has three rushing TDs, one by DG and two by the stable of backs. - UM only had one rushing TD and it was by Gardner
- Gallon has at least 75 receiving yards. In fact I wouldn't be surprised to see DG throw for 300. NDs secondary looked terrible in the first game. - Gallon more than doubled that with 184 and Garder threw for 294
- The UM D gets at least two sacks and five knockdowns.- Way off because I think there was only 1 sack and three knockdowns
- UM easily covers the spread and wins 38 - 21. - Spread covered, 41-30
_________________ Sometimes people standing on third base think they hit a triple, but they didn't - Jim Harbaugh
| |
|
| |
ThatGuy
Posts : 8811 Join date : 2012-02-03 Age : 49 Location : Within 10 minutes of The Big House.
| Subject: Re: ND predictions Sun Sep 08, 2013 3:35 am | |
| - 2ndComingOfBo wrote:
- 34-27 Blue.
I do believe that I was closest... _________________ 'eggo denoted me a First ballot Hall of Famer! - sandyeggo_blue wrote:
- that's some first ballot hall of fame stalking on your part. How in the world did you find that guy. I guess the better question is why?
| |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: ND predictions | |
| |
|
| |
| ND predictions | |
|