RUNNING BACK DEPTH

wondering if Justice Hayes will be tried at RB ..... we have Fitz , Rawls and Smith ..... not much depth considering that Fitz can be injury prone and as much as I like Smith he is not an every down back

It was mentiomn before that they may move him to SR , with his speed and skills that would get him out in the open

I know that was the talk but with not getting a RB in this class just wondering if he would stay at RB for depth purposes

I see your point now. would be nice to have a bruising back like Timmy B was but with DR running the offense how many chence's does he get

who is mike cox .... does even play anymore .... LOL

BOLEACH7 wrote:

who is mike cox .... does even play anymore .... LOL

But at least there's a 4th-5th guy there worst case!

You forgot to mention our best RB.... DENARD!!!!

Ha ha... all kidding aside I see your point. I think Fitz is the #1 no doubt. I bet we see a lot of Rawls this year. Cox gives us some depth but mostly just experience in case we absolutely need him. as mentioned, smith is a situational back. Don't get me wrong, I love V Smith but he's just doesn't fit the system. I'd like to see Hayes get some time but at this point I'll be happy with a guy who doesn't turn the ball over and can be used to keep the safeties and LBs honest. That may be the most valuable thing an RB can give us at this point.