One idea, and it's just me blabbing: A lot of us, even, ALL of us, seem to concur that we had too-high hopes following the OL's (like the team's overall) showing against our toughest opponent, ND. Esp. the OL, given the near-deification of ND's Nix and Truitt.
Here's my rag: Could it be that in that game, knowing we probably COULD NOT run on ND, and would have to rely on Gardner's arm (and escapes), as we did, the OL-men, esp. the interiors, were content to manage stalemates only on most plays, and content to let their guys through after 2, 3 seconds, knowing that was all Gardner, and the gameplan in place, REQUIRED of them in that game? But against Akron and UConn, they went for broke and tried doing TOO MUCH, thinking they had to open Bama-esque holes, and when they failed, their thought processes all went to hell?
As I say, the words of a babbling know-nothing who never played any organized football, let alone on the O-line. But--comments welcome.