| Brady Hoke | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
the artist formally known
Posts : 3649 Join date : 2012-01-25 Age : 70 Location : Northern Michigan
| |
| |
wshoes
Posts : 3840 Join date : 2012-10-17
| Subject: Re: Brady Hoke Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:45 pm | |
| On the other hand I'm pretty happy to be 5-0, though after beating ND, I certainly expected it. We did some interesting things with the O-line moving Jake around today and this game MAY be a confidence builder.
'shoes | |
|
| |
BetterThansparty
Posts : 8811 Join date : 2012-02-03 Age : 49 Location : Within 10 minutes of The Big House.
| Subject: Re: Brady Hoke Sat Oct 05, 2013 6:49 pm | |
| ...and that means so much.
At the same time do I think this team beats ohio as is? No.
I liked moving TAYLOR around too.... | |
|
| |
fishgoblue22
Posts : 5419 Join date : 2012-01-24 Age : 55 Location : Fishers, IN
| Subject: Re: Brady Hoke Sat Oct 05, 2013 9:58 pm | |
| Fuck, UM dominated from start to finish.. The announcers were sucking Minn's dicks because their coach was gone. Minn had one good drive. What's the fricken problem? | |
|
| |
BetterThansparty
Posts : 8811 Join date : 2012-02-03 Age : 49 Location : Within 10 minutes of The Big House.
| Subject: Re: Brady Hoke Sat Oct 05, 2013 10:19 pm | |
| 14-7 half-time score. We're Michigan fans, we want too much. What's the problem with that. Granted with that said we won and that's the main goal (other than developing young people for life and potential NFL careers. And as 'shoes kinda said, Taylor's versatility was impressive. | |
|
| |
sandyeggo_blue
Posts : 6174 Join date : 2012-01-23 Age : 45 Location : San Diego, CA
| Subject: Re: Brady Hoke Sun Oct 06, 2013 1:02 pm | |
| - fishgoblue22 wrote:
- Fuck, UM dominated from start to finish.. The announcers were sucking Minn's dicks because their coach was gone. Minn had one good drive. What's the fricken problem?
+1 i laughed when taylor lined up at RT and said gosh I wonder where this play is going. Then right on queue, run to the right for a TD. | |
|
| |
BetterThansparty
Posts : 8811 Join date : 2012-02-03 Age : 49 Location : Within 10 minutes of The Big House.
| Subject: Re: Brady Hoke Sun Oct 06, 2013 1:20 pm | |
| Well, technically he was lining up all over that game so where he lined up wasn't a determining factor. That was just the first time those announcers mentioned it. | |
|
| |
fishgoblue22
Posts : 5419 Join date : 2012-01-24 Age : 55 Location : Fishers, IN
| Subject: Re: Brady Hoke Sun Oct 06, 2013 1:44 pm | |
| Announcers really sucked yesterday, and I don't usually think they are biased. They never said a good thing about Gardner. Even once saying his accuracy was bad all day then said he was 11 of 14 which didn't mesh with their comment.
Also they kept saying that Lewan was lining up at TE, which he wasn't. It was an unbalanced line. Something football teams have been doing for a hundred years.
Last edited by fishgoblue22 on Sun Oct 06, 2013 2:46 pm; edited 1 time in total | |
|
| |
BetterThansparty
Posts : 8811 Join date : 2012-02-03 Age : 49 Location : Within 10 minutes of The Big House.
| Subject: Re: Brady Hoke Sun Oct 06, 2013 2:45 pm | |
| - fishgoblue22 wrote:
- Announcers really sucked yesterday, and I don't usually think they are biased. They never said a good thing about Gardner. Even once saying his accuracy was bad all day then said he was 11 of 14 which didn't mesh with their comment.
Is this the 14th time that we have agreed? | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Brady Hoke | |
| |
|
| |
| Brady Hoke | |
|