Members, please sign in.


Members, please sign in.


Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.



 
HomeHome  Latest imagesLatest images  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

 

 Going for two

Go down 
5 posters
AuthorMessage
dwoody

dwoody


Posts : 3635
Join date : 2012-03-12
Age : 71
Location : Michissippi - Don't drink the water!

Going for two Empty
PostSubject: Going for two   Going for two EmptySat Nov 30, 2013 4:48 pm

Had to be done. Good decision. Oh, well....
Back to top Go down
wshoes

wshoes


Posts : 3840
Join date : 2012-10-17

Going for two Empty
PostSubject: Re: Going for two   Going for two EmptySat Nov 30, 2013 4:51 pm

Liked the decision but should have changed the formation after timeout.
Back to top Go down
rasputin

rasputin


Posts : 184
Join date : 2012-02-02
Location : Mission Viejo, California

Going for two Empty
PostSubject: Re: Going for two   Going for two EmptySat Nov 30, 2013 4:55 pm

It was the right decision. Not only was Gardner gimpy, but there are no guarantees that it would have even gone to OT. The D was swiss cheese.

_________________
“And I remember across those years
Two banners that crowned the crest,
When Yale was king of the conquered East,
And Michigan ruled the West.”
Back to top Go down
the artist formally known

the artist formally known


Posts : 3649
Join date : 2012-01-25
Age : 70
Location : Northern Michigan

Going for two Empty
PostSubject: Re: Going for two   Going for two EmptySat Nov 30, 2013 5:01 pm

Rolling Eyes Totally right call, no way Michgan stops them, The O$U offense was way more efficient, plus We had no FG kicker, Thing is if , and BUG if we could have kicked FG earlier when we had the chance different outcome.Smile 

_________________
"HAIL HAIL MICHIGAN"
Wanted John Harbaugh but I'll
settle for JIM

WITH AN ENTHUSIASM UNKNOWN TO MANKIND
GOOO BLUE
Very Happy Very Happy
The Curse of Rich Rod


Back to top Go down
jjabilene




Posts : 645
Join date : 2012-01-25

Going for two Empty
PostSubject: Re: Going for two   Going for two EmptySat Nov 30, 2013 5:21 pm

It's funny, the only point in the game where I thought we actually might win was when we went for the 2-pt conversion. Of course Borges got owned on the play call, but what do you expect.
Back to top Go down
wshoes

wshoes


Posts : 3840
Join date : 2012-10-17

Going for two Empty
PostSubject: Re: Going for two   Going for two EmptySat Nov 30, 2013 7:25 pm

jjabilene wrote:
It's funny, the only point in the game where I thought we actually might win was when we went for the 2-pt conversion. Of course Borges got owned on the play call, but what do you expect.
Yeah we let them see the formation and the motion, gave them a timeout to talk about it and then ran the exact same thing. Puzzling.

'shoes
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





Going for two Empty
PostSubject: Re: Going for two   Going for two Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Going for two
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 :: MICHIGAN FOOTBALL :: MICHIGAN FOOTBALL FORUM-
Jump to: