| | No Khoury next year. |  |
|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
fishgoblue22
Posts : 5419
Join date : 2012-01-24
Age : 55
Location : Fishers, IN
| Subject: No Khoury next year.  Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:15 pm | |
| http://annarbor.com/sports/um-football/brady-hoke-press-conference-kicks-off-michigan-football-teams-spring-practice/?cmpid=mlive-@mlive-wolverines
Addition by subtraction. I think losing Molk is huge, but Barnum is talented and has started. Who is the LG? I think Mealer gets the first shot at it.
The rest of the line I'm not worried about.
LT- Lewan
LG- ??
C- Barnum or Miller
RG- Omemah
RT- Schofield
Lots of starting experience even if not at the same position. | |
|
| | |
Wolverdog
Posts : 516
Join date : 2012-01-24
| | Subject: Re: No Khoury next year. Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:20 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
Shazor25
Posts : 7
Join date : 2012-02-20
Location : Morristown, NJ
| | Subject: Re: No Khoury next year. Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:32 pm | |
| Yes indeed, Mealer or Bryant, and I have confidence on both of them. | |
|
| | |
WillieMfan
Posts : 1885
Join date : 2012-01-25
Location : Indianapolis/Cleveland
| | Subject: Re: No Khoury next year. Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:26 pm | |
| So how many spots do we have now for 2013 class? | |
|
| | |
Wolverdog
Posts : 516
Join date : 2012-01-24
| | Subject: Re: No Khoury next year. Sat Mar 17, 2012 3:30 pm | |
| Same as before Willie, though we picked one up with Isaiah Bell leaving.
So we're at 23 IIRC, pending further attrition. | |
|
| | |
BetterThansparty
Posts : 8811
Join date : 2012-02-03
Age : 49
Location : Within 10 minutes of The Big House.
| | Subject: Re: No Khoury next year. Sat Mar 17, 2012 4:06 pm | |
| So as far as I know we currently have 15 verbals and I guess that we are holding a spot for Levenberry. Is that corrext? And if so what are the other 7 positions of need? | |
|
| | |
joe
Posts : 4951
Join date : 2012-01-25
Age : 61
Location : God's Country
| | Subject: Re: No Khoury next year. Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:13 pm | |
| RB, WR, DT, not in that order particularly and not all inclusive.
I'd rather see a stud DT before the others because we'll find a pretty good WR. And I think a 3* will be able to run behind our offensive line in a couple of years.
| |
|
| | |
BetterThansparty
Posts : 8811
Join date : 2012-02-03
Age : 49
Location : Within 10 minutes of The Big House.
| | Subject: Re: No Khoury next year. Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:33 pm | |
| I'd also like a DT over a WR (unless a Calvin Johnson Jr. is available) but a stud RB wouldn't be a bad idea. Someone who can show what our line can do. Stack the box sparty, stack the box... | |
|
| | |
Wolverdog
Posts : 516
Join date : 2012-01-24
| | Subject: Re: No Khoury next year. Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:47 am | |
| Reports from Saturday's practice have Mealer running with the first team... though Bryant isn't practicing yet!  | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: No Khoury next year. | |
| |
|
| | |
| | No Khoury next year. | |
|
