I loved the 2-pt conversion call

Makes sense when you're the underdog. I'm sure there will be plenty of second guessing, but I loved it.

Me too. Most everyone in the crowd thought so too.

Good decision bad play call.

I liked the call to go for it, didn't like the play either.

The play was fine, Gardner just rushed the throw even though he had time.

Could you imagine being him, though? The pressure in that situation. Wow.

Great call to go for 2, especially with no kicker.

EJinGA wrote:

The play was fine, Gardner just rushed the throw even though he had time.

Could you imagine being him, though? The pressure in that situation. Wow.

Great call to go for 2, especially with no kicker.

I know he was gimpy, but I still think there should have been a run/pass option.

would have like to see a little roll out also, but I liked the call to gofor 2 the defense was not gonna stop O$U

Agree fish a run/pass option on a roll out.

At home you play for overtime. It doesn't get any simpler than that. Terrible decision, especially after OSU used a timeout to adjust their defense.

hailtoyourvictor wrote:

At home you play for overtime. It doesn't get any simpler than that. Terrible decision, especially after OSU used a timeout to adjust their defense.

Today was the exception to that rule. We would not have held them to less than a TD in OT save a turnover and our kicker was shaky, Devin limping. I think that was our best chance to win.

We did get out coached as you note on the play call- we should have changed up our formation.

'shoes

I completely disagree. At home you play for overtime. You cannot and will not convince me otherwise. Check the numbers.

hail I totally disagree, O$U was running all over us and No FG kicker. I believe it was the right time and situation to go for it nice call poor exacution. 2 recievers in the ame area.

In this case Hail you go for win, no way we ever stop Ohio from the 25 in OT,

In this case Hail you go for win, no way we ever stop Ohio from the 25 in OT,

Who had momentum? Who was at home? Who could lay it all on the line in OT?

Michigan. Michigan. Michigan.

You take it to OT.

YOU Wrong end of conversation HAIL not gonna get in a pissing contest about it

hailtoyourvictor wrote:

At home you play for overtime. It doesn't get any simpler than that. Terrible decision, especially after OSU used a timeout to adjust their defense.

I agree.  So that makes two of us, against how many? quite a few.  I think we need a poll.

You are 7-4 playing your hated unbeaten rivals who are on their heels, you go for it NO DOUBT, but as usual borges proves his incompetence by staying in the exact same formation

At the game and 1OO,OOO of us loved the call, and walking out heard very little complaining

Meechigan Man wrote:

At the game and 1OO,OOO of us loved the call, and walking out heard very little complaining

100,000 plus you, and about 20 on this forum, so that's 100,021 against 2, me and hail.  Hmmm, I'm thinking, nope I'm not changing my mind, go for the PAT.

Being at the game does not indicate people are better at making that decision. I had a handful of drunk friends at the game that still think Gardner is better than Braxton Miller. They supported the two point conversion call, but that doesn't make the decision any more credible.


The numbers are on my side. The momentum is on my side. You can disagree if you want, but to call me "wrong" is ignorant at best. I won't say you guys were wrong because it didn't work, because hindsight is 20/20, but calling me wrong is just biased ignorance. Biased ignorance is what makes several of you posters unbearable.

hailtoyourvictor wrote:

Being at the game does not indicate people are better at making that decision. I had a handful of drunk friends at the game that still think Gardner is better than Braxton Miller. They supported the two point conversion call, but that doesn't make the decision any more credible.


The numbers are on my side. The momentum is on my side. You can disagree if you want, but to call me "wrong" is ignorant at best. I won't say you guys were wrong because it didn't work, because hindsight is 20/20, but calling me wrong is just biased ignorance. Biased ignorance is what makes several of you posters unbearable.

Put Gardner on OSU and they don't skip a beat. Put Miller on UM and we are still 7-5.

Gee hail have a conipstion, we disagree with you can't believe I'm Ignorant cause I don't agree with you, wow sound like you wre pretty bad at the debate.

I said you can disagree and that is fine. There is no "wrong" or "right" decision. It is a coin flip. However, you called me "wrong", as if your belief is the only right answer. That is ignorance to the definition.

fishgoblue22 wrote:

Put Gardner on OSU and they don't skip a beat. Put Miller on UM and we are still 7-5.

Ok?

My point still stands that Braxton Miller is better than Devin Gardner. If you disagree with that, then you are delusional, fish.

hailtoyourvictor wrote:

fishgoblue22 wrote:

Put Gardner on OSU and they don't skip a beat. Put Miller on UM and we are still 7-5.

Ok?

My point still stands that Braxton Miller is better than Devin Gardner. If you disagree with that, then you are delusional, fish.

Have you seen Miller throw? He is a much better runner than Gardner but not nearly as good a passer. If you disagree with that you have lost all credibility and I'll assume you have never played, watched or heard of football.

I said Braxton Miller is a better QB than Devin Gardner and that includes running.

Braxton Miller is by far a better runner than Devin Gardner.

Devin Gardner would have to be by far a better passer than Miller to make it a debate, but he isn't. Is he better? Maybe, maybe not. Check the completion percentages, QB ratings, TD:INT ratios, etc. etc. Even if Gardner was a better passer, it is not enough to overcome how much better of a runner Miller is.

fishgoblue22 wrote:

hailtoyourvictor wrote:

fishgoblue22 wrote:

Put Gardner on OSU and they don't skip a beat. Put Miller on UM and we are still 7-5.

Ok?

My point still stands that Braxton Miller is better than Devin Gardner. If you disagree with that, then you are delusional, fish.

Have you seen Miller throw?  He is a much better runner than Gardner but not nearly as good a passer.  If you disagree with that you have lost all credibility and I'll assume you have never played, watched or heard of football.

I'm with fish on this one. If Devin had played for Urban he'd be a serious Heisman candidate. Braxton has had a fine year, give him his due.

'shoes

C'mon everyone.

No one is right or wrong n this one. It's a gut call. One guy in our group said he'd kick it too. We talked a little and he changed his mind but????????

Let's not get up in arms about it. No name calling or shit. It ain't worth it.