Seriously, how long have we discussed this?

Subject: Seriously, how long have we discussed this? Mon Jul 15, 2013 4:50 pm

Yes, we would like bigger games but this is about MONEY.

B/R just doesn't get it.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1703784-michigan-football-wolverines-2014-2015-schedule-could-do-more-harm-than-good?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=michigan-wolverines-football

_________________
'eggo denoted me a First ballot Hall of Famer!

sandyeggo_blue wrote:: that's some first ballot hall of fame stalking on your part. How in the world did you find that guy. I guess the better question is why?

If UM goes undefeated they will never be overlooked. Too much prestige and history in the program. JMHO.

fishgoblue22 wrote:: If UM goes undefeated they will never be overlooked. Too much prestige and history in the program. JMHO.

I tend to agree with Fish here. Having a 12-0 team is great for the bowls and the championship game but having a 12-0 team with pedigree takes the cake. I mean look at the hype around ND last year and that was with everyone fully well knowing that they were lucky to be undefeated.

_________________
Sometimes people standing on third base think they hit a triple, but they didn't - Jim Harbaugh

» As been discussed ad nauseum already!
» I could swear that this was discussed here months ago.
» I'm surprised that this hasn't been posted and discussed yet.
» Haven't been on for awhile, so if already discussed I apologize.
» "We want to be cool, like Michigan." The ND night game discussed...