Who do we have a the best chance to land

this weekdend ????

4* Gareon Conley

BTW, I thought he was a 3*. Did this just get updated or something?

http://recruiting.scout.com/a.z?s=73&p=8&c=1&nid=5819920

Or is my memory going?

I read or heard something the otherday that one of UM's recruits who is ONLY a 3-star is ranked the the very highest of all the 3-stars...I can't remember who they were talking about....Anyone?

Well, that's the thing.

How much better is the lowest rated 4* than the highest rated 3*?

1 person.

I remember a discussion in another world and another universe about how 1 4* was better than another because he was a 5.8 four star and the other guy was a 5.7 four star.

Bahhhhhhhhhh.

Honestly once we get the guy I don't care. Other than to brag that our team is better than someone else's what good does it do us?

Does it make us any better or any worse if every one of our 4*'s became 5*s now? Or 3*? No. It's just a number now.

Realize I'm saying this about players we already have verbals from. Not recruits still out there. (Do I sound dumb here?)

ZoneRead wrote:

I read or heard something the otherday that one of UM's recruits who is ONLY a 3-star is ranked the the very highest of all the 3-stars...I can't remember who they were talking about....Anyone?

I'm thinking that's Taco Charlton.

I saw on Twitter a day or two ago (the day the Scout 300 was released) people telling him to keep his head up, that the 300 list doesn't mean squat.

So, I think you're referring to him.

As for Conley, Joe, I saw 3* on here the other day when we first started talking about him. Remember, everyone was like 'why do we want a 3*?!'

This is my last post until this evening.

Coulda very well been Charlton...Thanks for the update...

Ty Issac, maybe it's wishful thinking but hey, we're Michigan.